How Inner Resonance reads a frequency study

Our research-reading method: what belongs in an article, what remains a hypothesis, and what cannot become a product promise.

We record more than the conclusion: study type, sample, comparison, outcomes, limitations and sources that readers can verify.

In this article
Illustration for the article How Inner Resonance reads a frequency study
The image supports orientation; the research claims are grounded in the article and its references.

Write the question clearly first

We record participants, intervention, comparison and outcomes. “Self-reported relaxation after ten minutes” is not the same question as “long-term clinical outcome”.

Do not stop at the paper title

Individual experiments offer clues; systematic reviews try to organise all relevant studies. PRISMA 2020 and the Cochrane Handbook help readers assess reporting transparency, bias, inconsistency and precision.[1][2]

Evidence coordinates in every article

Each review names its evidence type and states what is reasonably established and what remains uncertain.

  • Study type and sample size
  • Control condition and measurement
  • Consistency of findings
  • Applicability to the current product context
  • Primary sources and last-updated date

Allow updates while keeping limits visible

Scientific content changes with new research. We show first-published and last-updated dates; when evidence is insufficient, we write “uncertain” instead of hiding it behind polished copy.

References and primary sources

  1. [1]
    PRISMA 2020 Statement · PRISMA · 2020

    Checklist and flow for transparent reporting of systematic reviews.

  2. [2]
    Chapter 15: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions · Cochrane Handbook · 2024

    Framework for interpreting certainty and limitations of evidence.

Checking your account…

0 / 800

    Loading comments…

    Every non-essential category is off by default. You can reopen these settings from the footer at any time.

    See the Cookie Policy for purposes, retention periods and the current technology list. Refusing optional technologies does not affect public reading or basic features that do not need local storage.